Posts Tagged ‘Data Analysis’

Azerbaijan Data Launch and Webinar

Friday, June 4th, 2010

by Jessica Haeussler and Michael Tucci

How do banks and MFIs in Azerbaijan respond when asked to report their interest and fees publicly in a common APR or EIR format?

How does the shape of the price curve for Azerbaijan differ from other countries?

What factors seem to be driving prices in Azerbaijan?

How much variation is there in price for loans of similar size, and how might transparency change prices over time?

These are some of the questions that were explored during MFTransparency’s Webinar to highlight the launch of pricing data for the Azerbaijani microfinance market. On June 1st, Azerbaijan’s microfinance community took a definitive step towards pricing transparency and market efficiency, as 10 of the largest MFIs had their pricing data displayed publicly on MFTransparency.org. We here at MFTransparency would like to congratulate Azerbaijan on this important step forward and for their commitment to providing straightforward pricing information for their clients and other stakeholders. Additionally, we would like to extend our gratitude to the Azerbaijan Microfinance Association (AMFA) for their cooperation and coordination of the Transparency Initiative as well as to KfW, who funded our work in the Azerbaijan market.

(more…)

What Does the Data Tell Us? (Part 2)

Monday, February 15th, 2010

by Jessica Haeussler

In my last post, I examined data for Russia, Mexico and India, three large microfinance markets in different regions. We looked at the correlation between portfolio yield and loan size and discussed interest rates and profitability for MFIs with different focuses in terms of rural/urban populations and share of female clients. Comparing these markets, we observed a much broader range of yields in the Russian and Mexican market as compared to the Indian market.

How about operating expenses? It may be interesting to note that operating expenses are particularly high in Mexico, given that the cost of transportation, communication as well as salaries are higher than in many other countries and among the highest in Latin America. This is reflected in the median operating expense ratio reported by the MIX, which is 61.45% in Mexico, 16.21% in Russia and 11.12% in India. Looking at the median for only those MFIs with an ROA > 0 (sustainable), the median for the Mexican market is 48%, while it is 15% for Russia and 11% for India. From these numbers we can conclude that the median operating expense ratio for Mexican MFIs in considerably higher than for Indian MFIs, which could explain the higher market curve (yield) for Mexico. We might expect Mexican MFIs to be less profitable due to their higher operating costs, yet the analysis suggests pretty high ROEs. Could this be the result of an opaque pricing environment? What other factors could explain these findings? Will enhanced pricing transparency have an impact on this, as it promotes healthy consumer choice and competition among institutions?

(more…)

The Case for Pricing Transparency

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

by Alexandra Fiorillo

We are proud to announce that our very own Jessica Haeussler has an article on pricing transparency published in the most recent MicroBanking Bulletin. Please go here to read it. The MicroBanking Bulletin (MBB) is the “premier benchmarking source for the microfinance industry. The industry commentary, analysis and benchmarks are widely used by investors, donors, MFI managers, and service providers to facilitate greater standardization and a better understanding of developments in the microfinance sector.”

Here is a taste of her article, but please follow this link to see the full text in the Bulletin. You won’t be disappointed:

After decades of innovation and experimentation, microfinance sectors worldwide have achieved impressive successes. The microfinance community has joined efforts to achieve worldwide public recognition of microfinance as an effective and sustainable bottom-up approach to economic empowerment and consumption smoothing. The past years have seen equally strong efforts to provide a business case for microfinance, attract investors and access the global capital markets. As a result, the global microfinance industry has achieved a considerable record of transparency on financial performance. The true price of microcredit products, however, has never been accurately reported. As a double-bottom line industry that emerged to provide a low-cost alternative to the moneylenders, microfinance today is an industry where non-transparent pricing is common. Yet pricing transparency is critical in the market- based economy, as it promotes efficiency, healthy competition, innovation and affordable prices for millions of clients. For financial markets to develop sustainably and prosper, transparency is indispensable.

What Does the Data Tell Us?

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

by Jessica Haeussler

We have looked at the correlation between loan size and portfolio yield on several occasions and noticed that the shape of the curve closely follows that of loan size and operating expenses. For several markets, these country graphs suggest that a number of MFIs are making yields above the market average in a given loan-size category. Are these MFIs also more profitable than MFIs with yields closer to the market curve? We would expect operating expenses to be higher in rural areas. Do MFIs serving rural areas have higher yields than those operating in urban areas so as to cover these higher cost? Are they less profitable in terms of ROE? And are MFIs less profitable in those markets with relatively higher operating expenses as compared to other markets? Let’s look at three relatively large microfinance sectors in different regions: Russia, Mexico and India.

(more…)