Posts Tagged ‘MIX’

New Research from World Bank Highlights Tradeoffs in Microfinance

Friday, March 19th, 2010

by Michael Tucci

Asli Demirguc-Kunt, a chief economist at the World Bank, recently posted an article entitled “Microfinance: Dream versus Reality”. Her post provides an overview of the tough tradeoffs faced by microfinance institutions: between serving the poorest clients and achieving financial sustainability (and profitability). I highly suggest reading it, as it provides a synopsis of recent World Bank research and conclusions on the state of microfinance markets, including analysis using data culled from the MIX. The economists stress that their findings highlight the sometimes white-washed and downplayed tension between “meeting social goals and maximizing commercial success.” They conclude that “reaching the very poor with small-scale services remains a tough business and often entails charging high fees or depending on steady subsidies.”

To summarize in my own words, they point out the difficulty of simultaneously meeting 3 goals: commercial sustainability, financial access for the poorest, and reasonable rates (as illustrated by the graphic below). Any one side of the triangle connects two of these goals, but leaves the other behind.

(more…)

Thoughts on MIX Relaunch

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

by Michael Tucci

At the end of last year, the MIX (Microfinance Information Exchange) relaunched their website with the help of the MasterCard Foundation (click here for their official press release). For those familiar with the MIX, you’ll know that they have implemented some major changes in the last few months culminating in this relaunch. All in all, I’m very impressed with the new look and more importantly, the increased functionality of the website.

The data from the MIX has been an invaluable resource for us here at MicroFinance Transparency. Before tackling in-country operations, background research is essential, and the MIX market offers a great platform from which to gain a broad swath of information about MFIs and other microfinance stakeholders. I tend to use the MIX mainly for gathering information on MFIs, so with this in mind I’ll offer a brief review of some of my favorite features:

(more…)

What Does the Data Tell Us? (Part 2)

Monday, February 15th, 2010

by Jessica Haeussler

In my last post, I examined data for Russia, Mexico and India, three large microfinance markets in different regions. We looked at the correlation between portfolio yield and loan size and discussed interest rates and profitability for MFIs with different focuses in terms of rural/urban populations and share of female clients. Comparing these markets, we observed a much broader range of yields in the Russian and Mexican market as compared to the Indian market.

How about operating expenses? It may be interesting to note that operating expenses are particularly high in Mexico, given that the cost of transportation, communication as well as salaries are higher than in many other countries and among the highest in Latin America. This is reflected in the median operating expense ratio reported by the MIX, which is 61.45% in Mexico, 16.21% in Russia and 11.12% in India. Looking at the median for only those MFIs with an ROA > 0 (sustainable), the median for the Mexican market is 48%, while it is 15% for Russia and 11% for India. From these numbers we can conclude that the median operating expense ratio for Mexican MFIs in considerably higher than for Indian MFIs, which could explain the higher market curve (yield) for Mexico. We might expect Mexican MFIs to be less profitable due to their higher operating costs, yet the analysis suggests pretty high ROEs. Could this be the result of an opaque pricing environment? What other factors could explain these findings? Will enhanced pricing transparency have an impact on this, as it promotes healthy consumer choice and competition among institutions?

(more…)

The Case for Pricing Transparency

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

by Alexandra Fiorillo

We are proud to announce that our very own Jessica Haeussler has an article on pricing transparency published in the most recent MicroBanking Bulletin. Please go here to read it. The MicroBanking Bulletin (MBB) is the “premier benchmarking source for the microfinance industry. The industry commentary, analysis and benchmarks are widely used by investors, donors, MFI managers, and service providers to facilitate greater standardization and a better understanding of developments in the microfinance sector.”

Here is a taste of her article, but please follow this link to see the full text in the Bulletin. You won’t be disappointed:

After decades of innovation and experimentation, microfinance sectors worldwide have achieved impressive successes. The microfinance community has joined efforts to achieve worldwide public recognition of microfinance as an effective and sustainable bottom-up approach to economic empowerment and consumption smoothing. The past years have seen equally strong efforts to provide a business case for microfinance, attract investors and access the global capital markets. As a result, the global microfinance industry has achieved a considerable record of transparency on financial performance. The true price of microcredit products, however, has never been accurately reported. As a double-bottom line industry that emerged to provide a low-cost alternative to the moneylenders, microfinance today is an industry where non-transparent pricing is common. Yet pricing transparency is critical in the market- based economy, as it promotes efficiency, healthy competition, innovation and affordable prices for millions of clients. For financial markets to develop sustainably and prosper, transparency is indispensable.

What Does the Data Tell Us?

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

by Jessica Haeussler

We have looked at the correlation between loan size and portfolio yield on several occasions and noticed that the shape of the curve closely follows that of loan size and operating expenses. For several markets, these country graphs suggest that a number of MFIs are making yields above the market average in a given loan-size category. Are these MFIs also more profitable than MFIs with yields closer to the market curve? We would expect operating expenses to be higher in rural areas. Do MFIs serving rural areas have higher yields than those operating in urban areas so as to cover these higher cost? Are they less profitable in terms of ROE? And are MFIs less profitable in those markets with relatively higher operating expenses as compared to other markets? Let’s look at three relatively large microfinance sectors in different regions: Russia, Mexico and India.

(more…)